3 Types of “Low Hanging Fruit”

As we settle into what the Logistics geeks like myself call the slow season (1st and 2nd quarter), one of the core buzzwords out in our industry is going after the “low hanging fruit”. This term refers to revisiting, and putting more focus on shippers/customers that have steady year round business, and rekindling the dialogue to see if there is a value add that Logistic Services can provide.

You learn through blood, sweat equity and tears to quickly indentify a new or ongoing customer into one of three main “fruit” categories. The intent here is to provide a “cheat sheet” on how to quickly identify the amount of time, effort, and legwork should be spent on said opportunities.

The three types of LOW HANGING FRUIT as I see them:

EDIBLE, NOT RIPE YET, and ROTTEN:

EDIBLE – Some of the key characteristics of shippers/customers who are worth the sweat equity, time, legwork and resources:
A) Open book philosophy on discussing areas where they need assistance
B) Provide their pain points for short term value, with the opportunity for other opportunities if we can get our foot in the door
C) Willing to allow us to dialogue with other members of their supply chain, procurement, fulfillment and production divisions
D) Looking for both short term value, but long term partnership… discuss not only where they are at, but where they WANT TO BE.
E) Have commodities or services that require out of the box, dynamic and creative solutions
F) Clearly spell out what their focal points are in regards to their supply chain value add
a. Decreasing damage %, 24-7 access to load updates, keeping their customers in the loop better– all in last 12 months have been addressed with Logistic Services NW new customers to great success in that we knew how to make our customers life easier, and their customers as well (as important, and in some cases more important).

NOT RIPE YET – Sometimes you can get the sense that customer could see your value proposition, but just not right now, so what the core characteristics seems to be on these types of customers is:
A) Know they have some pain points/opportunities, but not high on their priority list right now, and candid about sharing that
B) Have undergone some events (normally personnel based) that won’t allow the proposition to get the proper amount of attention and bang for the buck, but clarify that they do see the value
C) Culture in current environment is resistant to change, but management is starting to implement ideas for the long term benefit of the company
D) Contractually tied into current providers, but willing to share when those commitments are ending
E) In the last 6 months, Logistic Services NW has had 3 distinct customer opportunities where the opportunity wasn’t there at the time. We kept in contact based on timelines provided, and doing what we said we would do (novel idea I know) we gained some revenue on each of the 3 customers

ROTTEN – Hate to finish with these, but everyone in the SUPPLY CHAIN world knows these types of customers, and they can be resource, time and attitude drains. Historically, they fall into one or more of these buckets EVERY TIME.
A) Only want you to deal with them, adamant that they control every aspect of the value proposition (re: uber micro managers)
B) Offer up a statement early on that Vendor X is the incumbent, and is always the best solution, and don’t think there is any value whatsoever in other methods of thinking, but if you want to try, here is information.
C) Offer up opportunities at the last second, and are “disappointed” when service proposal offered.
D) Give up macro level data streams (RFQ’s, full supply chain overviews), and then use as benchmark for current providers, and/or provide unreasonable counteroffers for the “privilege” of working with their company

In closing, the team at Logistic Services NW LLC has for the last 6 years, and will continue to work in the Supply Chain “orchard” for the EDIBLE AND NOT RIPE YET opportunities. The ROTTEN opportunities will continue to be there, but by quickly learning how to differentiate we are seeing more bang for the personnel and skill set buck…..

Whether the opportunity is NOW, SOON to be, or ON THE HORIZON is why we are in business. We provide a VALUE ADD SERVICE, and are only as good as the service we provide EVERY DAY.

“Value Proposition” – What does this really mean for Logistic Services NW LLC and more importantly any group we interact with?

One of our core objectives is to provide a good value proposition to any and all current and potential customers. Intent here is to specifically quantify what Logistic Services NW LLC states as OUR VALUE PROPOSITION with some specific case studies:

One of the models for creating a value proposition states four stages:
1. Market: for which market is the value proposition being created?
Our answer: We recently purchased a WMS system and implemented it (4th quarter 2011) to offer a solution for a specific customer who ships product from a Midwest and Pacific Northwest warehouse environment. Do we know the warehousing side of the Supply Chain, and consider it one of our core competencies – YES! Did we have “BRICKS and MORTAR (i.e. a warehouse in Midwest – NO!). Did we have a customer that was willing to trust that we could manage this for them in a better way than them doing it themselves – YES….within 3 weeks we PO cut, system purchased, warehouse provider chosen, employee and customer training done, product started receiving and shipping into facility in January of 2012!

2. Customer Experience: The effectiveness of the value proposition depends on gathering real customer, prospect or employee feedback.
Our answer: Working with a new customer in December 2011 who wasn’t satisfied with current supply chain, specifically the invoicing from their vendors. “Too hard to read, don’t know my true costs, have no idea how to budget, want a fixed price per unit”. We provided a simple 3 line item invoice offer to do their fulfillment, and goal is to start handle freight in February 2011. How? We listened to what their core issue was, and developed a solution around this. Nothing more, nothing less.

3. Offering: which products or services are being offered?
Our answer: We cant be the best solution for every customer, and that is important to realize. Can we handle a major retailers RFQ to do 500 transloads a week – NO! Can we handle (and currently do) a vendor selling into this retailer with one container a month, who needs expedited (i.e. 24 hour turnaround) transloads from Southern California into their customers regional DC in AZ? – YES, and our customer has grown their business 300% in the last fiscal year.

4. Alternatives and differentiation: what alternative options does the market have to the product or service?
Our answer: Working with a customer who was having specific issues with their product being damaged in transit to their regional DC’s. Why? Because the LTL providers as part of their normal SOP touched the freight multiple times en route to their DC. Our alternative, which is being implemented: A) Create dedicated lanes of FTL runs (current customer freight, with other customers freight going to same region) thereby eliminating the multiple touches of freight. Customer happy, damage % goes down, WIN WIN

Hello from Logistic Services NW & TRW Supply Chain Services

Welcome to our first monthly blog/newsletter.  Our intention is to use this blog as a method to keep our customer base and prospective clients informed as to our new offerings, value added services and learnings.

Logistics Services NW has been providing third party transportation and distribution services through its people, systems and processes.  We have been successful in designing logistics services that provide value to our clients in the form of improved service levels and reduced cost.  Our understanding of the following logistics cost drivers combined with our transportation management system allows us to deliver the end product of efficient and on-time material moves:

  1. Distance
  2. Mode
  3. Fuel Surcharge
  4. Utilization (Cube / Weight)

We have been expanding our understanding of the logistics cost drivers by moving up the supply chain to the fundamental supply chain process, the Sales, Inventory & Operations Planning (SI&OP) process.  We have partnered with TRW Supply Chain Services LLC and have been exploring the expanded view of supply chain planning (SI&OP) and its direct effect on logistics costs.  Through our partnership we have been able to enhance elements of the SI&OP process to specifically address the information required to feed into our Transportation Management System allowing for a better planning window and ultimately a lower cost solution.

We look forward to dialoging with you!

Thanks,

Logistics Services NW &  TRW Supply Chain Services